JP

Summary: Governments that impose taxes on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions can benefit from a cleaner, more climate-friendly environment and a revenue stream that can be tapped to lower other taxes and create jobs. But environmental taxes may also exact an excessive financial burden on low-income households, which spend a much greater fraction of their budgets than richer households do on heating oil, natural gas and electricity. This concern has limited the use of green taxes in Spain, where emissions are taxed at levels far below average for the European Union, which seeks to lower emissions across the continent to fulfill its 2015 Paris Agreement climate pledge.

Now a new study by researchers at the University of Oldenburg (Germany), the Basque Center for Climate Change, and the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change shows that low-income households in Spain can actually benefit from environmental taxes if revenues are redistributed to all taxpayers. Using a computational model to assess the environmental and economic impacts of a green tax reform policy in which revenues are recycled in equal amounts to households in annual lump-sum payments, the researchers found that the policy significantly reduces emissions without imposing economic hardship on any segment of the population. 

Summary: The repair of the Earth’s ozone layer, which shields the planet from the sun’s harmful ultraviolet radiation, has long been touted as a global success story. Since the 1987 Montreal Protocol required the phase-out by 2010 of production of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), nearly every nation in the world has complied, putting the ozone layer on track for a complete healing by midcentury. But a new development threatens to delay that happy ending. Recent studies have indicated that atmospheric concentrations of the second-most abundant chlorofluorocarbon, known as trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) and primarily used as foaming agent for building insulation, refrigerators and other consumer products, have significantly increased since 2012—and that some of this increase has come from eastern Asia. But this research did not establish the exact location and extent of this regional source of CFC-11 emissions.

Now a new study appearing in the journal Nature pinpoints the primary source of the rise in CFC-11 emissions as the northeastern Chinese provinces of Shandong and Hebei, with these two provinces accounting for at least 40 to 60 percent of the global rise in CFC-11 emissions. An international team comprised of scientists from MIT, University of Bristol and several other research institutions combined high-frequency atmospheric observations from Gosan, South Korea, and Hateruma, Japan, with global monitoring data (from NOAA and AGAGE) and atmospheric chemical transport model simulations to produce these findings.

The team found no evidence of significant increases in CFC-11 emissions from any other eastern Asian countries or other regions where long-term, high-frequency atmospheric data could be obtained. The researchers also deduced that the recent increase in CFC-11 emissions from eastern mainland China is due to new production and use of the banned chemical compound, rather than from increased rates of escape from pre-phase-out banks of CFC-11 in existing foam or refrigerators.

 

Pages

Subscribe to JP