JP

Summary: As the seventh largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions—primarily from agriculture (32%), land-use change and deforestation (28%) and fossil fuel consumption (27.7%)—Brazil plays a key role in global climate negotiations. In its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) to the Paris Agreement on climate change, the country has pledged to reduce its emissions by 37% in 2025 and 43% in 2030 (relative to 2005 levels). To meet these targets, the Brazilian NDC highlighted its intentions to decrease deforestation, reforest degraded land areas, expand the use of renewable energy sources, increase energy efficiency and expand the area of integrated cropland-livestock-forestry systems.

Using the MIT EPPA model, this study evaluates the costs associated with these and alternative policy instruments by 2030, as well as policy options to further reduce emissions after 2030.

The study projects that the cost of the Brazilian NDC will be just 0.7% of GDP in 2030. Further efforts to reduce carbon emissions beyond 2030 would require policy changes, since all potential emissions reductions from deforestation would be completed, and the capacity to expand renewable energy sources would be limited. Given these constraints, the study finds that an economy-wide carbon pricing system would help substantially to avoid higher compliance costs.

Abstract: Water supply infrastructure planning faces many uncertainties. Uncertainty in short-term in rainfall and runoff, groundwater storage, and long-term climate change impacts water supply forecasts. Population and economic growth drive urban water demand growth at rapid but uncertain rates. Overbuilding infrastructure can lead to expensive stranded assets and unnecessary environmental impacts, while under building can cause reliability outages with impacts on the economy, ecosystems, and human health. This dissertation assesses the potential for Bayesian learning about uncertainty to enable flexible, adaptive approaches in which infrastructure can be changed over time to reduce cost risk while achieving reliability targets. It develops a novel planning framework that: 1) classifies uncertainties and applies appropriate, differentiated uncertainty analysis tools, 2) applies Bayesian inference to physical models of hydrology and climate to develop dynamic uncertainty estimates, and 3) uses stochastic dynamic programming and engineering options analysis to assess the value of flexibility in mitigating cost and reliability risk. This framework is applied to three applications. Chapter 3 evaluates the potential for modular desalination design to manage multiple, diverse uncertainties — streamflow, demand growth, and the cost of water shortages — in Melbourne, Australia. Chapter 4 addresses uncertainty in groundwater resources in desalination planning in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and Chapter 5 addresses model uncertainty in climate change projections in a dam design problem in Mombasa, Kenya. Across all three applications, we find value in flexible infrastructure planning with a 9–28% reduction in expected cost. However, the performance of flexible approaches compared to traditional robust approaches varies considerably and is influenced by technology choice, economies of scale, discounting, the presence of irreducible stochastic variability, and the value society places on water reliability.

Pages

Subscribe to JP