JP

An article by Swart et al. in the same journal issue provides a review of how uncertainty has been treated in the assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and how this treatment has evolved over time. This essay by Webster offers three suggestions on how to better communicate uncertainty through the IPCC process, and comments on Swart et al.'s recommendation of a series of improvements for future IPCC assessments.

Key uncertainties in the global carbon cycle are reviewed and a simple model for the oceanic carbon sink is developed and described. This model for the solubility sink of excess atmospheric CO2 has many enhancements over the more simple 0-D and 1-D box-diffusion models upon which it is based, including latitudinal extension of mixed-layer inorganic carbon chemistry, climate-dependent air-sea exchange rates, and mixing of dissolved inorganic carbon into the deep ocean that is parameterized by 2-D eddy diffusion. By calibrating the key parameters of this ocean carbon sink model to various "best guess" reference values, it produces an average oceanic carbon sink during the 1980s of 1.7 Pg/yr, consistent with the range estimated by the IPCC of 2.0 Pg/yr ± 0.8 Pg (1992; 1994; 1995). The range cited in the IPCC study and widely reported elsewhere is principally the product of the structural uncertainty implied by an amalgamation of the results of several ocean carbon sink models of varying degrees of complexity. This range does not take into account the parametric uncertainty in these models and does not address how this uncertainty will impact on future atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

A sensitivity analysis of the parameter values used as inputs to the 2-D ocean carbon sink model developed for this study, however, shows that the oceanic carbon sink range of 1.2 to 2.8 Pg/yr for the 1980s is consistent with a broad range of parameter values. By applying the Probabilistic Collocation Method (Tatang et al., 1997) to this simple ocean carbon sink model, the uncertainty of the magnitude of the oceanic sink for carbon and hence atmospheric CO2 concentrations is quantitatively examined. This uncertainty is found to be larger than that implied by the structural differences examined in the IPCC study alone with an average 1980s oceanic carbon sink estimated at 1.8 ± 1.3 Pg/yr (with 95% confidence). It is observed that the range of parameter values needed to balance the contemporary carbon cycle yield correspondingly large differences in future atmospheric CO2 concentrations when driven by a prescribed anthropogenic CO2 emissions scenario over the next century. For anthropogenic CO2 emissions equivalent to the IS92a scenario of the IPCC (1992), the uncertainty is found to be 705 ppm ± 47 ppm (one standard deviation) in 2100. This range is solely due to uncertainty in the "solubility pump" sink mechanism in the ocean and is only one of the many large uncertainties left to explore in the global carbon cycle. Such uncertainties have implications for the predictability of atmospheric CO2 levels, a necessity for gauging the impact of different rates of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on climate for policy-making purposes. Since atmospheric CO2 levels are one of the primary drivers of changes in radiative forcing this result impacts on the uncertainty in the degree of climate change that might be expected in the next century.

Key uncertainties in the global carbon cycle are explored with a 2-D model for the oceanic carbon sink. This model has many enhancements over simple 1-D box-diffusion models, including mixed-layer inorganic carbon chemistry, climate-dependent air-sea exchange rates, and mixing of dissolved inorganic carbon into the deep ocean that is parameterized by 2-D eddy diffusion. At the same time it is much more computationally efficient than 3-D models which makes it applicable to a comprehensive parametric uncertainty analysis. By calibrating the key parameters of this ocean carbon sink model to widely referenced values, it produces an average oceanic carbon sink during the 1980s of 1.94 Pg/yr, consistent with the range estimated by the IPCC of 2.0 Pg/yr ± 0.8 Pg/yr (1994). The uncertainty range cited in the IPCC study and widely reported elsewhere is principally the product of the structural uncertainty derived from the results of several ocean carbon sink models of varying degrees of complexity. This range does not directly take into account the parametric uncertainty inherent in these models or how those uncertainties will impact on forecasts of future atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
      A sensitivity analysis of the parameter values used as inputs to the 2-D ocean carbon sink model developed for this study suggests that the IPCC's range for the oceanic carbon sink of 1.2 to 2.8 Pg/yr during the 1980s may be too conservative. By applying the Probabilistic Collocation Method to this simple ocean carbon sink model, the uncertainty in the size of the oceanic sink for carbon and hence future atmospheric CO2 concentrations is quantitatively examined. This uncertainty is found to be larger than that implied by the structural differences examined in the IPCC study alone. An average 1980s oceanic carbon sink of 2.06 ± 0.9 Pg/y (with 67% confidence) is estimated. This uncertainty is found to be dominated the uncertainty in by the rate of vertical mixing of dissolved carbon from the surface into the deep ocean which is parameterized in this study by vertical diffusion. A contribution of the uncertainty in vertical diffusion even increases with time from 83% in the 80s to about 97% in 2100. In contrast a contribution of an uncertainty in the rate of air-sea CO2 exchange decreases from 15% to less than 1% during the same period.
      It is observed that a wide range of parameter values can be used to balance the contemporary carbon cycle due to the large uncertainties in the total oceanic and terrestrial sinks. These parameter values yield correspondingly large differences in the range of future atmospheric CO2 concentrations when driven by forecasts of anthropogenic CO2 emissions scenarios over the next century. For a reference set of emissions similar to the IS92a scenario of the IPCC (1992), the uncertainty in the atmospheric CO2 concentration in 2100 is found to be 659 ppm ± 35 ppm (with 67% confidence). This uncertainty is solely due to uncertainties identified in the "solubility pump" mechanism of the oceanic sink, which is only one of the many large uncertainties lacking a quantitative examination in the global carbon cycle. Such uncertainties have implications for the predictability of atmospheric CO2 levels, a necessity for gauging the impact of different rates of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on climate and for policy-making purposes. Because of the negative feedback between the natural carbon uptake by the terrestrial ecosystem and atmospheric CO2 concentration, taking changes in the former into account leads to a smaller uncertainty in the latter compared to that in the case with the fixed terrestrial uptake.

Key uncertainties in the global carbon cycle are explored with a 2-D model for the oceanic carbon sink. This model has many enhancements over simple 1-D box-diffusion models, including mixed-layer inorganic carbon chemistry, climate-dependent air-sea exchange rates, and mixing of dissolved inorganic carbon into the deep ocean that is parameterized by 2-D eddy diffusion. At the same time it is much more computationally efficient than 3-D models which makes it applicable to a comprehensive parametric uncertainty analysis. By calibrating the key parameters of this ocean carbon sink model to widely referenced values, it produces an average oceanic carbon sink during the 1980s of 1.94 Pg/yr, consistent with the range estimated by the IPCC of 2.0 Pg/yr ± 0.8 Pg/yr (1994). The uncertainty range cited in the IPCC study and widely reported elsewhere is principally the product of the structural uncertainty derived from the results of several ocean carbon sink models of varying degrees of complexity. This range does not directly take into account the parametric uncertainty inherent in these models or how those uncertainties will impact on forecasts of future atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
      A sensitivity analysis of the parameter values used as inputs to the 2-D ocean carbon sink model developed for this study suggests that the IPCC's range for the oceanic carbon sink of 1.2 to 2.8 Pg/yr during the 1980s may be too conservative. By applying the Probabilistic Collocation Method to this simple ocean carbon sink model, the uncertainty in the size of the oceanic sink for carbon and hence future atmospheric CO2 concentrations is quantitatively examined. This uncertainty is found to be larger than that implied by the structural differences examined in the IPCC study alone. An average 1980s oceanic carbon sink of 2.06 ± 0.9 Pg/y (with 67% confidence) is estimated. This uncertainty is found to be dominated the uncertainty in by the rate of vertical mixing of dissolved carbon from the surface into the deep ocean which is parameterized in this study by vertical diffusion. A contribution of the uncertainty in vertical diffusion even increases with time from 83% in the 80s to about 97% in 2100. In contrast a contribution of an uncertainty in the rate of air-sea CO2 exchange decreases from 15% to less than 1% during the same period.
      It is observed that a wide range of parameter values can be used to balance the contemporary carbon cycle due to the large uncertainties in the total oceanic and terrestrial sinks. These parameter values yield correspondingly large differences in the range of future atmospheric CO2 concentrations when driven by forecasts of anthropogenic CO2 emissions scenarios over the next century. For a reference set of emissions similar to the IS92a scenario of the IPCC (1992), the uncertainty in the atmospheric CO2 concentration in 2100 is found to be 659 ppm ± 35 ppm (with 67% confidence). This uncertainty is solely due to uncertainties identified in the "solubility pump" mechanism of the oceanic sink, which is only one of the many large uncertainties lacking a quantitative examination in the global carbon cycle. Such uncertainties have implications for the predictability of atmospheric CO2 levels, a necessity for gauging the impact of different rates of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on climate and for policy-making purposes. Because of the negative feedback between the natural carbon uptake by the terrestrial ecosystem and atmospheric CO2 concentration, taking changes in the former into account leads to a smaller uncertainty in the latter compared to that in the case with the fixed terrestrial uptake.

Achieving agreement about whether and how to control greenhouse gas emissions would be difficult enough even if the consequences were fully known. Unfortunately, choices must be made in the face of great uncertainty, about both likely climate effects and the costs of control. Because several of the greenhouse gases have residence times of decades to centuries, any economic and environmental consequences are for practical purposes irreversible on those time scales. On the other hand, the commitment of resources to emissions control also has an irreversible aspect: investment foregone leaves a permanent legacy of reduced human welfare. Neither of the extreme positions, to take urgent action now or do nothing awaiting firm evidence, is a constructive response to the climate threat. Responsible treatment of this issue leads to a difficult position somewhere in between.

Achieving agreement about whether and how to control greenhouse gas emissions would be difficult enough even if the consequences were fully known. Unfortunately, choices must be made in the face of great uncertainty, about both likely climate effects and the costs of control. Because several of the greenhouse gases have residence times of decades to centuries, any economic and environmental consequences are for practical purposes irreversible on those time scales. On the other hand, the commitment of resources to emissions control also has an irreversible aspect: investment foregone leaves a permanent legacy of reduced human welfare. Neither of the extreme positions, to take urgent action now or do nothing awaiting firm evidence, is a constructive response to the climate threat. Responsible treatment of this issue leads to a difficult position somewhere in between.

© Spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlagsgesellschaft mbH

Future global climate projections are subject to large uncertainties. Major sources of this uncertainty are projections of anthropogenic emissions. We evaluate the uncertainty in future anthropogenic emissions using a computable general equilibrium model of the world economy. Results are simulated through 2100 for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), sulfur dioxide (SO2), black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). We construct mean and upper and lower 95% emissions scenarios (available from the authors at 1°×1° latitude–longitude grid). Using the MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM), we find a temperature change range in 2100 of 0.9 to 4.0°C, compared with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emissions scenarios that result in a range of 1.3 to 3.6°C when simulated through MIT IGSM.

© 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Future global climate projections are subject to large uncertainties. Major sources of this uncertainty are projections of anthropogenic emissions. We evaluate the uncertainty in future anthropogenic emissions using a computable general equilibrium model of the world economy. Results are simulated through 2100 for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), sulfur dioxide (SO2), black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). We construct mean and upper and lower 95% emissions scenarios (available from the authors at 1 ° x 1° latitude-longitude grid). Using the MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM), we find a temperature change range in 2100 of 0.9 to 4.0 ° C, compared with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emissions scenarios that result in a range of 1.3 to 3.6 ° C when simulated through MIT IGSM.

The MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) is a set of coupled sub-models that include the Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model as well as those that simulate atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial earth systems. Emissions scenarios from EPPA are used as inputs into a coupled chemistry/climate model along with natural emissions of greenhouse gases from Natural Emissions Model as they change with climate and other forcings. The IGSM includes an urban air chemistry model for treating emissions in urban areas and the Terrestrial Ecosystems Model simulates carbon and nitrogen dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. These features allow the IGSM to project concentrations of the relevant trace gases and other pollutants, accounting for photochemical processes and the feedback of climate on natural emission sources; radiative forcing from these trace gases; temperature and precipitation at different latitudes (longitudinally averaged) and global mean; and sea level rise due to thermal expansion of the oceans.
Future emissions of greenhouse gases, their climatic effects, and the resulting environmental and economic consequences are subject to substantial uncertainties. Analysis of possible future climate changes should include quantification of the uncertainty in climate projections. Many climate models use prescribed greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. Ideally, the uncertainties in emissions scenarios are jointly considered with uncertainties in climate models. For many climate models, however, it is not computationally feasible to run hundreds of scenarios.We evaluate the uncertainty in the future anthropogenic emissions using a computable general equilibrium model of the world economy. A significant source of uncertainty in future emissions is a result of uncertainty in future economic growth and technological change. Unlike physical properties, results of human behavior such as these are not well explained or predicted, and the future will not necessarily be the same as the past. We develop emissions projections that are consistent with underlying economic, demographic, and technological assumptions across substances for any year and over time. For describing and quantifying uncertainties we use the following steps. First, all assumptions of the economic model are subjected to sensitivity analysis. Alternative values for each parameter are tested to see which result in the greatest change in the model outcome. This is used to identify the most influential assumptions for further detailed study. The second step is to construct descriptions of the full range of possible alternatives for each assumption and the relative likelihood of each alternative assumption. The third step is to conduct Monte Carlo simulation, in which we randomly sample from the distributions of model assumptions and calculate the corresponding model outcome. After repeating this process many times, the frequency distribution of outcome values becomes an estimate of the uncertainty in that outcome, conditional on the assumed distributions of inputs. As a result, we develop and present a set of emissions scenarios that describe a central tendency and high and low cases that bound an explicit probability.We use the climate sub-model of the IGSM to compute the climate impacts that result from the scenarios. We present the results simulated through 2100 for carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), sulfur dioxide (SO2), black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3), and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs).
This work updates a previous study. New results we report take advantage of recent studies of the historical patterns of economic growth and energy efficiency change that has attempted to sort out the contribution these phenomena have made from the effects of changing energy prices. These studies have sought to use historical data to estimate uncertainty in these major determinants of energy use and GHG emissions, thus reducing the reliance on expert judgment. While human systems and responses in the future are not constrained by past behavior we argue that historical data where available should at least be used to inform expert judgment about future trends.
A critical issue we investigate is the degree of correlation among the growth rates of nation’s economies. We find that if the longer run economic prospects of different economies are uncorrelated then future emissions uncertainty is much less than if they are highly correlated; the nature of Monte Carlo sampling means that samples with relatively high economic growth (and thus rapid emissions growth) in some regions likely are offset by slow economic (and emissions) growth in other regions, reducing greatly the likelihood of generating parameter sets where all regions grow either rapidly or slowly. There is potential evidence for correlation among growth rates, but also obvious examples where country specific factors dominate (slow growth of economies of Russia and much of eastern Europe in the 1990’s and in Japan, while the US and countries like China and India grew rapidly). Empirical results on correlation have limited statistical significance because adequate data series are too short. Moreover an important economic trend has been increasing interactions among economies as communication, transport and mobility costs have declined with improving technology, thus making the long-term historical record of perhaps limited relevance to the future. Further investigation of the likely degree of correlation among future economic growth rates of countries is one area that could lead us to narrow the range of future emissions forecasts.

In order to analyze competing policy approaches for addressing global climate change, a wide variety of economic-energy models are used to project future carbon emissions under various policy scenarios. Due to uncertainties about future economic growth and technological development, there is a great deal of uncertainty in emissions projections. This paper demonstrates the use of the Deterministic Equivalent Modeling Method, an efficient means for propagating uncertainty through large models, to investigate the probability distributions of carbon emissions from the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis model. From the specific results of the uncertainty analysis, several conclusions with implications for climate policy are given, including the existence of a wider range of possible outcomes than suggested by differences between models, the fact that a "global emissions path through time" does not actually exist, and that the uncertainty in costs and effects of carbon reduction policies differ across regions.

Pages

Subscribe to JP