Uncertainty in counting ice nucleating particles with continuous flow diffusion chambers

Journal Article
Uncertainty in counting ice nucleating particles with continuous flow diffusion chambers
Garimella, S., D.A. Rothenberg, M.J. Wolf, R.O. David, Z.A. Kanji, C. Wang, M. Rösch and D.J. Cziczo (2017)
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 10855-10864

Abstract/Summary:

This study investigates the measurement of ice nucleating particle (INP) concentrations and sizing of crystals using continuous flow diffusion chambers (CFDCs). CFDCs have been deployed for decades to measure the formation of INPs under controlled humidity and temperature conditions in laboratory studies and by ambient aerosol populations. These measurements have, in turn, been used to construct parameterizations for use in models by relating the formation of ice crystals to state variables such as temperature and humidity as well as aerosol particle properties such as composition and number. We show here that assumptions of ideal instrument behavior are not supported by measurements made with a commercially available CFDC, the SPectrometer for Ice Nucleation (SPIN), and the instrument on which it is based, the Zurich Ice Nucleation Chamber (ZINC). Non-ideal instrument behavior, which is likely inherent to varying degrees in all CFDCs, is caused by exposure of particles to different humidities and/or temperatures than predicated from instrument theory of operation. This can result in a systematic, and variable, underestimation of reported INP concentrations. We find here variable correction factors from 1.5 to 9.5, consistent with previous literature values. We use a machine learning approach to show that non-ideality is most likely due to small-scale flow features where the aerosols are combined with sheath flows. Machine learning is also used to minimize the uncertainty in measured INP concentrations. We suggest that detailed measurement, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, be performed to characterize this uncertainty.

Citation:

Garimella, S., D.A. Rothenberg, M.J. Wolf, R.O. David, Z.A. Kanji, C. Wang, M. Rösch and D.J. Cziczo (2017): Uncertainty in counting ice nucleating particles with continuous flow diffusion chambers. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 10855-10864 (https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10855-2017)
  • Journal Article
Uncertainty in counting ice nucleating particles with continuous flow diffusion chambers

Garimella, S., D.A. Rothenberg, M.J. Wolf, R.O. David, Z.A. Kanji, C. Wang, M. Rösch and D.J. Cziczo

Abstract/Summary: 

This study investigates the measurement of ice nucleating particle (INP) concentrations and sizing of crystals using continuous flow diffusion chambers (CFDCs). CFDCs have been deployed for decades to measure the formation of INPs under controlled humidity and temperature conditions in laboratory studies and by ambient aerosol populations. These measurements have, in turn, been used to construct parameterizations for use in models by relating the formation of ice crystals to state variables such as temperature and humidity as well as aerosol particle properties such as composition and number. We show here that assumptions of ideal instrument behavior are not supported by measurements made with a commercially available CFDC, the SPectrometer for Ice Nucleation (SPIN), and the instrument on which it is based, the Zurich Ice Nucleation Chamber (ZINC). Non-ideal instrument behavior, which is likely inherent to varying degrees in all CFDCs, is caused by exposure of particles to different humidities and/or temperatures than predicated from instrument theory of operation. This can result in a systematic, and variable, underestimation of reported INP concentrations. We find here variable correction factors from 1.5 to 9.5, consistent with previous literature values. We use a machine learning approach to show that non-ideality is most likely due to small-scale flow features where the aerosols are combined with sheath flows. Machine learning is also used to minimize the uncertainty in measured INP concentrations. We suggest that detailed measurement, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, be performed to characterize this uncertainty.

Posted to public: 

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 14:30